SEARCH:
GO

 THE OFFICIAL SITE OF THE EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME

Citroen C4

Citroen C4 1.6 Hdi, LHD


ADULT OCCUPANT

CHILD OCCUPANT

PEDESTRIAN

SAFETY ASSIST


 

Citroen C4

Citroen C4 1.6 Hdi, LHD


ADULT OCCUPANT

CHILD OCCUPANT

PEDESTRIAN

SAFETY ASSIST
Total 32 pts | 90%
Head: Good, Neck: Good, Chest: Adequate, Upper leg right: Good, Upper leg left: Good, Lower leg right: Adequate, Lower leg left: Good, Right foot: Good, Left foot: Good
FRONTAL IMPACT
15.2 pts
Head: Good, Chest: Adequate, Abdomen: Good, Pelvis: Good
SIDE IMPACT CAR
7.8 pts
SIDE IMPACT POLE
6.5 pts
Neck: Marginal

Total 42 pts | 85%
PERFORMANCE
11.3 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
18 month old child
RestraintBRITAX RÖMER BABYSAFE+
Group0, 0+
FacingRearward
InstallationAdult seatbelt

PERFORMANCE
11.4 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
 
3 year old child
RestraintBRITAX RÖMER DUO+
Group1
FacingForward
InstallationISOFIX anchorages and top tether

VECHICLE BASED ASSESSMENT
7.0 pts
See comments
Total 15 pts | 43%
Pedestrian protection

HEAD
7.9 pts
PELVIS
1.5 pts
LEG
6.0 pts


Total 7 pts | 97%
SPEED LIMITATION ASSISTANCE
0.8 pts
Active
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC)
3.0 pts
ESP
SEATBELT REMINDER
3.0 pts
driver
passenger
rear

Automatic Emergency Call (eCall)


Details of tested car

Specifications
Tested model Citroen C4 1.6 Hdi, LHD
Body type 5 door hatchback
Year of publication 2010
Kerb weight 1205kg
VIN from which rating applies Applies to all applies C4s of the specification tested
Class SMALL FAMILY
Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag
Front passenger frontal airbag
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Side pelvis airbag


Comments

Adult occupant
In the frontal impact, the passenger compartment remained stable. Dummy readings indicated good protection for the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger and there were no structures in the dashboard likely to pose a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes or those sat in different seating positions. In the barrier side impact the chest protection was adequate. However, in the pole side impact the chest protection was only rated as weak and the abdominal protection was adequate. The assessment for whiplash protection in a rear impact was rated as marginal.

Child occupant
In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy was not excessive. The 18 month dummy was sat in a rearward facing restraint which also provided good protection to the head. In the side impact test, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints. The passenger's airbag can be disabled by means of a switch in the glove box, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is presented to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.

Pedestrian
The bumper area scored maximum points for the protection offered to a pedestrian's lower leg. The front edge of the bonnet, where a pedestrian's upper leg would impact, offered mostly poor protection. The bonnet top where a child or small adult head would impact offered mixed levels of protection. However, the protection offered to adults was extremely poor over the entire area.

Safety assist
Electronic Stability Control (ESC) is fitted as standard to all variants in most European countries. In some countries, ESC is an option on the base specification but standard on others. Sales of ESC as standard equipment are expected to be sufficiently high for the system to be rewarded by Euro NCAP. A driver-set speed limitation device is standard across the model range as is a front and rear seat belt reminder system.

 DISCLAIMER  CONTACT